With the decision of Congress not to remove immunity from President Morales, the Public Ministry and the Cicig have been prevented from continuing the investigation into irregular electoral financing.
As expected, the Guatemalan Congress decided to vote against the request for legal action filed by the Public Prosecutor to waive the immunity of Jimmy Morales.This means that the president is spared, at least for now, from being tried in the case of allegedillicit electoralfinancing.
Four petitions for pre trial hearings have already been lodged against President Morales, following his request to expel the leader of the International Commission against Impunity from Guatemala.
EDITORIAL
In less than a week a series of events took place which have left the country on tenterhooks.The Public Ministry and the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (Cicig) filed a petition for a pre trial hearing against President Morales for alleged illicit electoral financing; Morales declared the Commission of the Cicig, Iván Velásquez, persona non grata, and requested his expulsion from the country. In response to this, three other requests for preliminary hearings have been filed in the last few hours.
The CICIG has shown that in practice the private financing of candidates and political parties is anonymous, unlimited and uncontrolled, and that 25% of it comes from drug trafficking.
From the introduction of a report by the International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG), "FINANCING OF POLITICS IN GUATEMALA"
The relationship between money and politics is a problematic topic that has been addressed both in the field of philosophy and political science, aS well as in public debate. In the academic world, this issue has been addressed in arguments that show how detrimental it is to the social and political order that the same people and groups that concentrate economic power also concentrate political power, and therefore what is sought and prefered are institutional designs which contribute to keeping the two spheres separate. However, both in societies with consolidated democracies and countries in the process of democratizing, the decisive influence of groups with economic power has been maintained or increased.