Ayesa Inelectra-TMB will Manage Panama´s Metro

The Spanish consortium was awarded the bid to manage the Panamanian Metro.

Thursday, November 25, 2010

The financial offer made for $ 27.9 million was the lowest received, and the proposal was also the one with the highest score.

"The consortium consists of engineering Ayesa (48%) of Spanish origin, the Venezuelan engineering Inelectra (32%) and TMB, the entity which manages Barcelona's transportation systems (20%)," wrote Roberto Gonzalez on his article in Prensa.com.

¿Busca soluciones de inteligencia comercial para su empresa?



More on this topic

Management of Metro Line 2 Awarded in Panama

July 2014

The Spanish-American consortium made up of Ayesa Ingeniería y Arquitectura S.A, The Louis Berger Group and Metro de Barcelona will be responsible for the project management.

The Secretariat of the Panama Metro has awarded PML2 Consortium (Spanish-American) contract for Project Management (Project Management) of Metro Line 2.

$40 million Tender for Project Management of Metro Line 2

March 2014

The Ministry of the Presidency of Panama is putting out to tender the services of Project management, interface coordination and support for the Metro Line 2 Project.

Panama Government Purchase 2014-0-03-0-08-015427-AV:

"PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES (PROJECT MANAGEMENT-PM), INTERFACE COORDINATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE PANAMA METRO LINE 2 PROJECT."

Still no Management for Panama Metro

October 2010

A month ago the Metro Department ordered the evaluation committee to review the proposals, but the winner of the management contract has not yet been decided.

"The committee submitted a report on the 24th of August, giving the highest score to a consortium led by Spanish companies Transportes Metropolitanos de Barcelona and Ayesa, but errors where identified ..."

Way Cleared for Metro Management Contract Award

September 2010

Panama's public acquisitions directorate has rejected the claim presented by GMP consortium.

The public acquisitions directorate judged that GMP's attempts to demonstrate its experience were not detailed enough and that the content was largely superficial. In doing so it supported the evaluating committee's decision to disqualify the consortium.

ok